• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Boycotting because they used generative AI to make their game instead of hiring writers. Even if this was the only part of the game they used it on (if you believe that, l have a bridge to seII you), I’m not going to give someone money if they couldn’t even be fucked to hire some sci-fi writer off of fiverr to write their fill text with it.

      I personally know artists and writers who are having to get jobs at fucking Walmart because of this shit. I’ll be less irate about generative AI once we have universal basic income so that real artists can continue to generate real art alongside these soulless husks.

      • duchess@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        So they shouldn’t even use it as placeholder assets, instead of Lorem Ipsum?

        • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          Correct! If you’re not going to support artists and writers, the least you can do is not support the industry that’s actively destroying the fields of art and writing (on top of the myraid other problems with generative AI)

          • Goodeye8@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 hours ago

            So do you just not play video games at all? Because the way you’ve just presented yourself you’re not against using AI in games, you’re against any use of AI.

            How can you be sure that in any game AI wasn’t used to generate some sort of an internal document or asset that would never be in the final product but was integral to the creation of the final product? Clearly you don’t write every dev and ask if they use AI in any capacity, so what do you do?

            My point is that I think you’re taking a stance where you’re unwilling to compromise on the use of AI, but only if you’re aware that AI was used.

            • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              How can you be sure that in any game AI wasn’t used to generate some sort of an internal document or asset that would never be in the final product but was integral to the creation of the final product?

              I never claimed to be omniscient. I simply don’t support a company after I find out that they have unethical business practices. What are you not understanding about this?

                • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 hours ago

                  No? I just don’t know that I should avoid a product if I don’t know about the ethical problems with it. That’s how boycotts work…

                  • Goodeye8@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    That’s like saying you boycot Nestle but won’t stop using any of their subsidiary products unless you accidentally find out that a brand not named Nestle is actually owned by Nestle.

                    You had a bridge to sell to anyone with the naivete to believe it’s the only place AI was used. What about your naivity of believing that other games are not using AI, unless of course you stumble on the information about AI usage? Seems hypocritical to criticize others for giving the benefit of doubt while giving the benefit of doubt to all other developers simply because you don’t know any better?